| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ryanw
Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Posts: 782 Location: New York, NY
|
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 5:30 pm Post subject: At Mount Zoomer reviews-Post em' here |
|
|
http://www.kevchino.com/review/wolf-parade/at-mount-zoomer/1547
Here's one I found today. I don't know where to start with this review. The constant comparisons to eighties synthpop are really bizarre, it makes you wonder it this person has ever listened to the Smiths the way they compare "The Grey Estates" to them. I don't hear much Cure in here either.
Also, when writing a review, it's bad form to attribute vocals incorrectly, especially since Spencer and Dan's vocal styles are so different.
I have found some positive ones as well, but this one seems particularly off in its criticism.
Discuss... _________________ Either way it is time...for a bigger kind of kill. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Double Helix

Joined: 10 Apr 2008 Posts: 177
|
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 6:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That review is terrible. The Smiths? Really? The cure? Seriously? Is that the best they could come up with?
Almost reminds me of an girlfriend I used to have that used to go, "These sloan guys sound just just like the beatles." But at least she was onto the right influences... (and into me so I didn't really care too much)
That review reminds me of some of the message board chatter I've read recently. The kids that don't think At Mount Zoomer is as catchy as Apologies have nothing interesting to complain about aside from the fact that they think it's not as catchy as Apologies. It reminds me of the same stuff that people said about Neon Bible when it came out, only to find later that many serious critics disagreed with them. Then people started calling Neon Bible "a grower."
It's funny because I haven't read anything really that's mentioned any legitimate reason to pan the album, just a whole lot of "Well, it's no apologies"talk.
I wonder what some casual Radiohead fans were saying whenever Radiohead went off in another direction before the critics chimed in... Probably a whole lot of the same. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tsuru

Joined: 05 Sep 2007 Posts: 41
|
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 6:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
that review was messed up.... not the overall opinion, it's fine if he's "meh" about it, but what the fuck is he talking about??
"At Mount Zoomer is great bar band music"
huh??
Where are these bars??? I want to go now! _________________ TSURURADIO |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Double Helix

Joined: 10 Apr 2008 Posts: 177
|
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 7:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Tsuru wrote: | that review was messed up.... not the overall opinion, it's fine if he's "meh" about it, but what the fuck is he talking about??
"At Mount Zoomer is great bar band music"
huh??
Where are these bars??? I want to go now! |
Ha ha, I thought the same thing.
He keeps listing positives that do make sense and then his negatives sort of don't.
How is this traditional music? Who else but Wolf Parade are writing songs like "Bang your drum?" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
electronicmaji

Joined: 03 Apr 2006 Posts: 278
|
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 8:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well I agree that AMZ is the most accessible Wolf Parade or Spencer Krug release. But bar music? Did he accidentaly put on the lastest Hold Steady album? _________________ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
davis64
Joined: 20 Apr 2008 Posts: 24
|
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 8:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't think this guy has listened to the album.
That or I downloaded a completely wrong copy, cause I'm pretty sure there wasn't a track called “An Animal in Your Cure” on it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hyden

Joined: 27 Feb 2006 Posts: 1434 Location: Where ever evil rears its ugly head (Mostly Philadelphia)
|
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 11:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
he keeps saying retro, pisses me the fuck off, I hate that word as is, something tells me that whatever this guy hears that isn't reinventing the wheel is "retro", and nobody has ever really reinvented the wheel.
plus "The Smiths written all over it...eighties synth sounds" is not just wrong, it's the antithesis of the Smiths, they rarely ever used keyboards, and if they did, it was piano's, they we're viciously anti-synthpop. _________________ I'm going to pray for the cold, I'm going to pray not for anything at all
5th in total posts. 1st in your heart?
Think about it, will you? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
front to back

Joined: 16 Feb 2006 Posts: 598
|
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 11:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This record sounds nothing like The Smiths. I've always felt that most of the keyboard parts sounded pretty 80's inspired, however. _________________ I know, I know, oh no. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stuartstuart123

Joined: 03 Oct 2007 Posts: 45
|
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 3:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
I hate so much these "I know soooooooo much about music" reviews.
Generally, they just throw a million pre-nineties musicians/bands onto the page and hope it sticks. Hack writing at its finest.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Username880
Joined: 04 Oct 2007 Posts: 232
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ash Hol

Joined: 02 Sep 2007 Posts: 34
|
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 7:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| so idk what that first review guy was thinking. he said it doesnt break new ground. what? wp is different from any other band (besides the other projects) and most mainstream band's cds sound all the same. as in there is no unique lyrics, no unique riffs or anything. i think when people review stuff they should review how different it is w/out theyre opinion of it in it. see where im going? i love mt zoomer for those reasons and more.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
twiggy_stardust

Joined: 30 May 2008 Posts: 178 Location: away from all welcome mats
|
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 12:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| stuartstuart123 wrote: | I hate so much these "I know soooooooo much about music" reviews.
Generally, they just throw a million pre-nineties musicians/bands onto the page and hope it sticks. Hack writing at its finest.... |
I could sign that with my own blood. I sometimes have a feeling that music reviews are more about boasting with (non-existant) musical knowledge rather than actually trying to build a view about the album.
And honestly, could someone tell those "music critics" that if a band plays with guitars it doesn't necessarily mean they are drawing influences from smiths... _________________ You've got mascara making broken-hearted shapes on your face and you have yet to see the ghost |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ARisen

Joined: 13 Jul 2007 Posts: 1147 Location: Toronto.
|
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 8:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | In recent studies, scientists found that people already familiar with the music are more likely to catch a chill at key moments:
When two singers have contrasting voices |
hmmmmm |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ecto24

Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 1429 Location: Buffalo
|
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 9:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ARisen wrote: | | Quote: | In recent studies, scientists found that people already familiar with the music are more likely to catch a chill at key moments:
When two singers have contrasting voices |
hmmmmm |
that happens to me actually, it's great when i get chills from the music i listen too.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ARisen

Joined: 13 Jul 2007 Posts: 1147 Location: Toronto.
|
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 9:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| hey ryanw, see if you can add a poll to this existing thread to see how many among us get them chills. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|